
| Offshoring | Outsourcing | |
| Strengths | Burden of social responsibility is not yours | Stronger narrow field expertise |
| Lower production costs | ||
| Weaknesses | You have less control and transparency over the workflow | |
| Cumbersome supervision/coordination | In project-based approach, assignments need to be carefully evaluated | |
| Travel expenses (trainers, etc.) | Need to inform the outsource company about minute specifics | |
| Culture and language gaps | Negotiations may take up time and effort | |
| Opportunities | HR resource pool is richer | Valuable insights from the field provide opportunity for growth |
| You can focus on your business’ core competency | ||
| Threats | Confidential information concerns | |
| PR issues about transferring jobs abroad | “Feeding the competitor”: the other company learns on your projects to potentially serve your competitor | |
Another case is when companies choose to offshore for cost efficiency and want their expert level to cover the quality requirements. In this case, the question of where to offshore becomes relevant once more.While Asia and developing countries can offer many highly qualified offshore professionals, they are often regarded as a marketplace for cheaper options. With these, companies outsourcing (or rather offshoring) there can sometimes be heard complaining about dubious outcomes. Some jobs do not require scrupulous implementation, some do. A skilled consultant may be required to navigate the market.Enter regions like Eastern Europe. While a middle dev here charges at about $35, which is higher than their Indian counterpart, this corresponds to higher quality, making countries like Ukraine and Russia a popular “golden means” choice. For example, Ukraine’s got strong tradition of technical education, and IT is a popular choice for reprofiling, often done based on the same facilities. This accounts for about 90,000 IT professionals in the country, keeping the high plank to keep their competitive advantage.

